1980s Nissan Bluebird TR X sedan 5
1980s Nissan Bluebird TR X sedan 5

OMG! It’s a Bluebird with the works

You look at some cars and have to wonder: what were they thinking?

Take this 1980s model Datsun/Nissan Bluebird. The model was quite a nice looking bit of gear for the time.

But somehow, somewhere along the line, the person who “did up” this particular Bluebird, how shall we say – lost the plot.

Note the bolt on fender flares, the bonnet scoop and that huge rear wing — wonder how much downforce they got from that at 60km/h?

 

Australia took the rear-wheel drive 910 Bluebird from from 1981 to 1984 with the L20B engine, and from 1985 to 1986 with the CA20S engine — both 2.0 litres in size.

In Australia 130,000 910s were built between 1981 and 1986. The name change from Datsun Bluebird to Nissan Bluebird did not occur until 1983.

The Australian model was a downgraded, locally produced version of the Japanese model with no independent rear suspension, electronic fuel injection, or turbo versions.

However, the cars were offered in a sporty version, known as the TR-X.

The main difference between these Bluebirds and the base models were sporty trim, including an optional front air dam, centre mount aerial, 15-inch alloy wheels, a small rear spoiler, map lights, seats with better bolstering and so forth.

Mechanically, the cars were not much different.

The main differences to be found are rear disc brakes which were shared with the GLX and a 3.9:1 diff ratio compared to the standard 3.7:1.

The 910 was eventually replaced by the Pintara, a locally built vehicle based on the Skyline — but with a four-cylinder engine.

Nissan won the 1982 Australian Endurance Championship for Makes with two factory entered, 910 series Bluebird Turbos.

On September, 29, 1984, George Fury put his Nissan Bluebird Turbo (imported with a Nissan Z turbo engine and fabricated IRS) on pole position for that year’s Hardie 1000 touring car race, with a time of 2:13.850.

Have you spotted a car that’s just downright fugly. Send us your pics: riley@cars4starters.com.au

 

CHECKOUT: Nissan’s ugly duckling spreads its wings

CHECKOUT: Nissan LEAF: The power to change

  1. The car was done this way to help out either charities or promote medical research
    the trespasser took photos of that car with out permission and has no qualifications to say the owner has lost the plot , the writer indicated lack of respect to the owner as it simply is just another hack trying to make them self the big wig…..so pathetic it’s sad. Go get a real job.

    1. Point 1. It’s not trespassing when the car is on public property. Last time I checked one does not own the footpath.
      Point 2. I’m already the big wig.
      Point 3. I’m retired.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *