They’re separated by price and size, but deciding between Honda’s HR-V and CR-V twins is a lot tougher than you might think.
The chunky HR-V is Honda’s small offering and bears no relationship to the car sold here quite a few years ago under the same name.
CR-V is larger and Honda’s mainstream, bread and butter model, with a seven-seat version available — but not across all grades.
Although HR-V is smaller, accommodation is still more than comfortable for four adults, with plenty of rear legroom — but ultimately has a smaller boot.
The more we drive HR-V, however, the more we have come to appreciate and respect it.
If there’s just the two of you, then it’s a no brainer — spend your savings on the one with all the fruit.
What’s it cost?
Prices for HR-V start from $24,990, topping out at $34,590 plus on-roads for the VTi-LX — subject of our test.
CR-V kicks off $30,690 with the top of the range, all-wheel drive model going for $42,290 plus on-roads.
Our mid-grade VTi-S is priced at $33,290 or $35,490 with all-wheel drive thrown in (you probably won’t notice the difference).
The HR-V comes with 17-inch alloys, twin climate air, heated leather seats, LED headlights, panoramic sunroof, rear view camera, lane watch camera for passenger side, front and rear parking sensors plus a power adjust driver’s seat.
It’s also fitted with Honda’s Advanced Driver Assist System with forward collision warning, high-beam support system and lane departure warning — as well as auto emergency braking.
CR-V is similarly equipped, with larger 18-inch wheels, an electric tailgate and the addition of of adaptive cruise control.
Both cars feature a 7.0-inch touchscreen with satellite navigation, but CR-V adds DAB+, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
What’s it go like?
HR-V is powered by a 1.8-litre naturally aspirated four cylinder petrol engine that develops 105kW of power and 172Nm of torque, the latter from 4300 revs.
It’s paired with a CVT continuously variable style auto with seven steps or gears that in top spec form comes with gear change paddles which give a little more control when needed.
Fuel consumption is rated at 6.9L/100km (we got 8.1).
CR-V’s 1.5-litre turbo produces 140kW and 240Nm, the latter between 2000 and 5000 revs — this extra torque makes a world of difference.
It too is paired with a CVT.
Fuel consumption is rated at 7.3L/100km (we got 7.7)
Although the HR-V is remarkably smooth, comfortable and compliant in a city environment, it’s let down by an awful CVT transmission that exhibits all of the worst aspects of CVTs — it’s zoomy, generally breathless, and not much fun to drive when pressed.
But most of the time, it stays hidden and does produce excellent fuel economy.
The CR-V’s 1.5-litre turbo in contrast packs a punch and is a breeze to drive. If anything it lacks character, which could be a good thing depending on your viewpoint.
It’s also hooked up to a CVT but it couldn’t be different in execution, mainly because the engine doesn’t have to work as hard.
The steering is very light in both, while the CR-V has a more sophisticated multi-link rear suspension.
Overall, CR-V feels newer and more advanced in design.